International Indian Treaty Council

     CONSEJO INTERNACIONAL DE TRATADOS INDIOS

“WORKING FOR THE RIGHTS AND RECOGNITION OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES"
   
Home About Us Contact Web Content Search
 

 
Home
Urgent / Urgente
IITC E-News
UN Declaration
Upcoming Events
IITC Training
OAS Declaration
Environment
Climate Change
Treaties / Tratados
The Right to Food
Prisoners
Permanent Forum
Racism
Treaty Conferences
Treaty Council News
Human Rights
International Decade
Global Trade
Cultural Rights
Youth Program
Women & Children
Health / Toxics
Affiliate Input
IITC Annual Reports
Contact information
Links
Make a Contribution
IITC Photos
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kuna Yala

Systems for prior-informed consent at the community-level

and their development and accommodation under existing national legislation

 

Prepared by Estebancio Castro Diaz

 

 

 

International Gathering: Indigenous Perspectives on Genetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge

Tsleil-Waututh Nation

North Vancouver, Canada

February 25th-March 1st 

 

 

    

 

Information Office                                               Estebancio Castro Diaz

International Indian Treaty Council       53 Aniseed Grove

2390 Mission Street, Suite302                        Upper Hutt, Wellington

San Francisco, CA 94110, USA                      New Zealand 6007

Tel: +(415) 641-4482                                        Tel: + 64 4 977 9010

Fax: + (415) 641-1298                                      Fax: + 64 4 977 9015

Email: iitc@treatycouncil.org                            E-mail: estebancio@treatycouncil.org           

 

Kuna Yala

Systems for prior-informed consent at the community-level

and their development and accommodation

under existing national legislation

 

Introduction

 

In Kuna Yala we have a model of free prior informed consent that is currently implemented in our daily activities and decision-making processes.  In this paper I will explain this model, its historical background as well as some current examples of how this model works within our communities.

 

The collective and traditional systems of rights in indigenous societies pre-date the nation-state. The Kuna people have developed practices according to their people’s needs, such practices having been established prior to the Convention on Biological Diversity.

 

Community level

 

Kuna people have a common philosophy and worldview that provides the overriding framework for our lives.  Our different systems of administration, decision-making processes and law simply reflect the desires and needs of each of the different communities.  Our holistic view encompasses values such as our land, territories, environment and resources and are inextricably linked both culturally and spiritually. The protection of our environment which is our mother earth is essential. Our relationship with the environment is one of children, we are the offspring of our land.  We have a common and shared experience in that we are born in the same nation, upon the same land and are joined by the unity of family relationships and common ancestors.

 

According to the Kuna sociologist Perez Archibold, our decision-making processes and self determination began centuries ago when “our ancestors understood the importance to build society based on Pab Igala”[1].  There are four essential items according to Pab Igala”[2]  These four items as interpreted by Archibold are as follows.

 

1.      In order to survive as a nation and to maintain our systems of property, we must defend, care and control our land, territory and resources.

2.      We must maintain the capacity to make decisions that deeply affect our people.  We must keep our systems of government, and our capacity to negotiate with foreign parties.

3.      To preserve our traditions, historical memories, language, and our ways of transmission.  By preserving and protecting these things we will be able to freely relate to the dominant society secure in the knowledge of who we are.  We must also be confident to critique the dominant society based on our own values and forms of knowledge.

4.      To strengthen our religion in order to face the unjust reality.  To use our religion as a vehicle to make our nation and historical memory more dynamic.

 

According to our elders, Kuna cultural, social and administrative organisation is based on the concepts ‘Nega’ and ‘Onmaked’Nega refers to the house, the base of the family and unity, Onmaked refers to the meeting of people. These two concepts also symbolise unity, participation and solidarity. The two concepts and its elements are the bases of our free prior informed consent process and implementation in our communities.

 

Kuna self determination and decision making processes use free prior and informed consent and are based on these elements. According to Hernandez and others[3] in their first national report on self determination self determination represents four values in practice which are call bulaled, kuamagaled, kuenadigualad and tuikualed.  These four values mean collectively, with one mind, brotherhood/fraternity, and unity.

 

In using these concepts Kuna people celebrate traditional Kuna meetings in every community - people come together in order to inform, analyze, discuss and adopt decisions on matters related to their communities such as projects, development, local issues and spiritual issues. For example, when a Kuna community needs to develop a new road they will inform, consult and make a decision with all the members of the community as to whether this project is feasible for the well-being of their members including the spiritual well being of their land.

 

The Kuna General Congress

 

From these concepts our elders built what we call “Onmaked Dummad” This means the Kuna General Congress. The Kuna General Congress is represented by three chiefs - they are similar to the president of a republic.  However, the difference is that our chiefs have to meet twice a year in the Kuna General Congress with the chiefs of every community to discuss agreements, resolutions, and the needs of Kuna Yala.

 

These three people are responsible for internal Kuna projects that are created by the Kuna General Congress.  They also answer to the official 250 or more delegates who attend the Kuna General Congress.

 

The Kuna General Congress is an administrative and political institution.  This body is also responsible for negotiations between the Kuna people and the Panamanian government.  The Kuna General Congress meets every six months.  However, if Kuna Yala has problems that need to be resolved, then a special meeting can be called.  Every community has to attend with their administrative chief and their five delegates, all of them can speak but only the chief can vote.

 

In the General Congress we decide many issues that relate to issues at the regional, national, and international level.  These decisions are made according to our laws, our norms, our customs, and our free prior informed consent.

 

There are many experiences in Kuna Yala of free prior informed consent and benefit sharing. For example, Kuna have independently dealt with their use of territorial water and land for the purpose of laying Trans-Atlantic fiber optic cable between South America, North America and Europe. This deal has brought economic benefit to two communities directly and, an income to the Kuna General Congress.

 

Lopez a Kuna lawyer states that Kuna people have developed a historical mechanism to create internal norms and a set of requirements to establish prior inform consent as a main element to deal with people who are not Kuna and who are interested in working with Kuna. This has ensured that the Panamanian government respects and consults with Kuna on matters relating to Kuna land[4].

 

As a result of these practices and customs, the Fundamental Law was created by a commission that was established by the Kuna General Congress.  This Commission was made up of Kuna professionals and delegates of communities.  The Fundamental Law of the Kuna Yala was adopted in the community of Urgandi 15-19 June 1995.

 

The Fundamental Law is related to political constitutions, organizations, administration, practices, and duties.  The Fundamental Law creates a special regime that is based on Kuna custom.

 

Article No 3, states:

The Kuna Yala Comarca constitutes a separate political division from the republic of Panama.  The organisation, administration and the functions of the Comarca will be under the special regime established in this law.

 

This article recognises the Comarca of Kuna Yala as a political division.  In this Comarca the jurisdiction of the Kuna Congress and their authorities is recognised. The Comarca of Kuna Yala is not an indigenous reservation, it is a political entity.

 

From this article the Comarca of Kuna Yala is under a special juridical regime, based on our traditional values. The Kuna General Congress constitutes an administrative political organism that deliberates and makes decisions at the bi-annual meetings. The decisions taken in the Kuna General Congress are official agreements and resolutions, and must be accepted by all of the communities and also, the governmental authorities that exist in the Comarca of Kuna Yala.

 

Existing national law

 

The Kuna fundamental law has not been recognized by the Panamanian constitution because the current government policies subject our fundamental law to national profit oriented interests.

 

Our fundamental law states that we are sovereign over all the land, including under the ground.  However the government does not recognise our rights because they say underground resources belong to the government.

 

In 1996 the Panamanian government approved a mining concession to the Canadian Company Western Keltic Mines Inc in our land to license, explore and exploit the Kuna Comarca. The concession was granted without any prior informed consent of the Kuna General Congress.  The Kuna General Congress revoked the permission granted by the Panamanian government. This decision was based on the policies of infiltration of our land, division amongst our people and the undermining and weakening of our political institutions.

 

Despite the fact that the Panamanian government does not recognize the fundamental law of Kuna People they acknowledged the Kuna General Congress when Kuna people revoked the permission to Western Keltic Mines Inc.  They agreed that Kuna people are under a special regime and Kuna norms and laws apply in Kuna Yala.

 

The Panamanian government has established laws to protect traditional knowledge. They also states that they recognize prior informed consent in legislation as per the CBD mandate. However, in the general environmental law they reproduced the text of Article 8(j) from the CBD but did not include the word “approval”.

 

Arias a Kuna expert stated in his case study that traditional knowledge “is not protected by laws, and although legislative initiatives exist to protect biological diversity and forests, and there are laws recognizing indigenous territories, they do not include knowledge”.  Further, he explained that article 97 of the General Environmental Law ignores a fundamental principle: that of the consent of those who possess the knowledge. This is left to the free will of those wishing to commercialize the knowledge of indigenous and local communities[5]

 

There has been a lack of full and effective participation of indigenous peoples regarding processes affecting indigenous communities such as policies, decrees and laws related to the environment.  Arias also found out thatthe Laws promulgated so far have not considered the presence of indigenous peoples and therefore there are always major gaps and limitations to their implementation in indigenous communities.”[6]

 

Indigenous full and effective participation is mandatory. Indigenous peoples’ participation will assist conservation and the implementation of the CBD programme of work by creating effective policies in order to protect the environment.

 

Conclusion

 

Kuna culture and traditional practices of self-government and decision-making processes have supported and have served Kuna communities very well. The Kuna traditional system of free prior informed consent is a model of implementing self-determination.  It is based in Kuna culture, traditions, identity, the peoples’ self-esteem and ways of life.

 

The Panamanian government may not officially recognize in their constitution the Kuna fundamental law but it seems in practice that the Panamanian government recognizes Kuna traditional systems of self governance and they deal with Kuna Yala as a political entity. Their recognition has provided legitimacy to our traditional institutions and decision-making process.

 

The Kuna model of self governance and decision-making is a necessary condition for us to continue having appropriate sustainable development and provides a focused and direct response in the new era of globalization.

 

By using free prior informed consent on a daily basis as a mechanism to make decisions, Kuna people are seeking greater autonomy with minimal interference from the Panamanian government.  This is a slow process but one that we are committed to.  This right will also allow us to improve upon our own existing laws in order that our own communities are better governed and able to incorporate new ideas.

 


 

[1] Pab Igala refers to the Kuna religion.  The four statements above were articulated by the Kuna, Ibeler.  He wanted to the record the history of the Kuna people in order that the memories and the lives of the people would never die or be forgotten.  Ibeler was a teacher who created the four statements to give the people a strategy with which to fight and to negotiate.  Ibeler was a key person in the politicization of the people.  He was able to join the struggle of the fight with political ideals.  Ibeler strengthened the Pab Igala and is known to Kuna people as a warrior.

[2] Taken from an interview with Juan Perez Archibold, 10 May 1999.

[3] Artinelio Hernandez, Atilio Martinez, Bernal Castillo and Irik Limnio, Autonomia Multicultural: Condicion necesaria para el desarrollo sostenible. First nacional report. Available on www.latautonomy.org/informenacionalpanama.pdf

 

[4] Atencio Lopez, taken from an interview, in February 20, 2006

[5] Arias Garcia Marcial, Forests, Indigenous Peoples and Forestry Policy in Panama:  An assessment of national implementation of international standards and commitments on traditional forest related knowledge and forest related issues

[6] Above see note 5.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Latest IITC E-News

Treaty Council May 2010 E-News

Treaty Council February 2010 E-News

Past Issues

Action Alerts /

Acciones Urgentes:

THE UNITED STATES REVIEWING ITS POSITION ON THE UN DECLARATION ON THE RIGHTS OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES:  BACKGROUND UPDATES AND POINTS FOR INPUT FROM IITC, June 15th 2010 (PDF 107K)

Chickaloon Village in Alaska takes a stand against Usibelli Coal mine, press release June 6th 2010 (PDF 42K)

US State Department Review of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Consultation schedule

IITC UPR Submission for the United States of America Examination, April 12th , 2009 (PDF 35K)

UPR State Department “Listening session” with Indigenous Peoples Agenda, Albuquerque March 16th, 2010 (PDF 407K)

HUMAN RIGHTS “LISTENING SESSIONS” AROUND US FOR THE UPR REVIEW PROCESS: National Update from IITC, February 17th 2010 (PDF 95K)

New IITC Fact Sheet: US to be reviewed by the UN Universal Periodic Review (UPR) process in 2010, submissions due April 19th , 2010 (PDF 94K)

IITC Submission to US Senate Subcommittee on Human Rights and the Law, US Obligations under International Treaties” (submissions due by December 18th) (PDF 64K)

"Millions lack access to affordable and adequate housing in the U.S.", UN Press Release November 8th 2009

Preliminary findings by the UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Adequate Housing Raquel Rolnik on her recent US visit” November 7th 2009 (PDF 103K)

Comunicación y Accion Urgente de CITI al ONU sobre el asesinato de Miguel Angel Perez en Morelos Mexico, 10 noviembre de 2010 (PDF 37K)

IITC Urgent Action Communication to the UN on the assassination of Miguel Angel Perez in Morelos Mexico, November 19th 2009 (PDF 30K)

Asesinado Dirigente Indigena en México, 31 de octubre 2009 (PDF 71K)

Indigenous leader Assassinated in Morelos Mexico October 31st 2009 (PDF 88K)

UN Rapporteur on the Human Right to Adequate Housing to visit Pine Ridge Reservation as part of US investigation, IITC press release October 11th 2009 (PDF 173K)

American Indian activist Peltier denied parole

IITC Urgent Action letter to Peruvian government, June 9th 2009 (PDF 90K)

Final “Anchorage Declaration” from the Indigenous Peoples’ Global Summit on Climate Change, April 24th 2009

 

Important Updates

Noticias al Dia:

UN Environment Programme (UNEP), First session of the intergovernmental negotiating committee to prepare a global legally binding instrument on mercury (INC 1) June 7 – 11, 2010, Stockholm Sweden- Indigenous Peoples Statement, June 7, 2010, presented by Jackie Warledo, IITC

New! Web site for the UN Rapporteur on the Situation of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of Indigenous Peoples, James Anaya

Declaración final de la Conferencia de las Organizaciones Sociales, Movimientos Sociales y ONG previo a la Consulta Regional de la FAO sobre Directrices Voluntarias de Tenencia de la Tierra y Recursos Naturales, realizada los días 17,18 y 19 de mayo de 2010, Brasilia, Brasil

UNPFII 9th session, Joint Interventions and reports submitted or endorsed by IITC

Minister of Maori affairs Dr. Pita Sharples announced to the UNPFII 9th session April 19th, 2010: “Today New Zealand changes its position: We are pleased to express our support for the Declaration"

US Permanent Representative to the UN announces at UNPFII9, April 20th 2010: “The United States has decided to review our position regarding the U.N. Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples”

A Brief Overview: Key United States' International Human Rights Obligations relevant to the UN Universal Periodic Review (UPR) Process" IITC handout (PDF 83K)

International Expert Group Meeting: Indigenous Children and Youth in Detention, Custody, Foster-Care and Adoption

Lima Declaration, II Latin American Indigenous Summit on Climate Change January 25 – 26, 2010 (PDF 163K)

UN Expert Mechanism on Indigenous Peoples calls for submissions for Study on Right to Participate in Decision Making” by February 26th (PDF 17K)

Declaración de Lima Por la Vida de la Madre Naturaleza y Humana”, II Cumbre Latinoamericana sobre Cambio Climático e Impacto en los Pueblos Indígenas: Post Copenhague, Lima, Perú el 25 y 26 de Enero del 2010 (PDF 162K)

NEW BOOK - Making the Declaration Work

International Indigenous Peoples Forum on Climate Change Final High Level Statement to COP4 in Copenhagen, December 18, 2009

Certificate of Honor presented to the IITC by the City and County of San Francisco Board of Supervisors, November 23rd 2009 (PDF 284K)

International Indigenous Peoples’ Forum on Climate Change (IIPFCC) Statement on Shared Vision, COP 15, Copenhagen, 7 December 2009

United Nations Permanent Forum 9th session, April 19th - 30th 2010

Alcatraz Thanksgiving and 40th Anniversary Sunrise Gathering November 26th 2009 (PDF 696K)

IITC Brochure 10-09 (PDF 132K)

IITC Brochure, En Espanol 10-09 (PDF 132K)

IITC 2009 Annual Conference Resolutions/Resoluciones de la Conferencia Anual de CITI de 2009 en Ustupu Panama

New IITC Handout: “Food Sovereignty and the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (PDF 254K)

Oja informativa actualizada de CITI: “La Soberanía Alimentaria y los Derechos de los Pueblos Indígenas” (PDF 266K)

New/Nuevo: Necessary Information for Complaints to Human Rights Bodies/ Información Necesaria para las Comunicaciones a instancias de Derechos Humanos (PDF 71K)

New brochure: IITC Human Rights Training Program (PDF 371K)

Nuevo folleto: Programa de Capacitación y Formación sobre Derechos Humanos de CITI (PDF 168K)

OHCHR Study on climate change and human rights

Indigenous Peoples and the Right to Free Prior Informed Consent”, new IITC educational factsheet (PDF 115K)

Los Pueblos Indigenas y el Derecho al Consentamiento Libre, Previa e Informada”, nueva hoja informative de CITI (PDF 111K)

IITC Submission to the OHCHR for Study on Human Rights and Climate Change- December 26th, 2008 (PDF 272K)

NEW Indigenous Portal for up to the minute news on Indigenous Peoples’ work at the UN and around the world

Human Rights Training Materials

New: Updated IITC fact sheet: Pesticides, Tribal Health and Human Rights, North and South (PDF 111K)

Nuevo: Hoja informativa actualizada de CITI: “LOS PLAGUICIDAS, LA SALUD DE LAS TRIBUS Y LOS DERECHOS HUMANOS EN EL NORTE Y EL SUR” (PDF 111K)

UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples as adopted by the UN General Assembly September 13th 2007 (PDF 56k)

Declaracion de las Naciones Unidas sobre los derechos de los Pueblos Indigenas, adoptada por la Asemblea General el 13 de septiembre de 2007 (PDF 60K) 

Link for the COMMITTEE FOR THE ELIMINATION OF RACIAL DISCRIMINATION

Pesticides are Poison” booklet now available online

Los Plaguicidas son Venenos” manual ahora disponible en internet

UN Web page, Indigenous Peoples and Treaties, the UN Treaty Study Expert Seminars