International Indian Treaty Council

     CONSEJO INTERNACIONAL DE TRATADOS INDIOS

“WORKING FOR THE RIGHTS AND RECOGNITION OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES"
   
Home About Us Contact Web Content Search
 

 
Home
Urgent / Urgente
IITC E-News
UN Declaration
Upcoming Events
IITC Training
OAS Declaration
Environment
Climate Change
Treaties / Tratados
The Right to Food
Prisoners
Permanent Forum
Racism
Treaty Conferences
Treaty Council News
Human Rights
International Decade
Global Trade
Cultural Rights
Youth Program
Women & Children
Health / Toxics
Affiliate Input
IITC Annual Reports
Contact information
Links
Make a Contribution
IITC Photos
 

 

 

Fight environmental injustice and support the Winnemem Wintu Tribe

 

the Winnemem Wintu unveiled  a mural Saturday, November 26th in San Francisco.

 

The Winnemem Wintu tribe was in San Francisco to unveil a Mission District mural that honors the campaign against the proposed heightening of Shasta Dam, and the Winnemem struggle to protect cultural, historic and natural resources.  The mural, created by Evan Bissell and Claude Moller, depicts Winnemem Wintu tribal members at the ceremonial war dance on Shasta Dam, which was held one year ago. The unveiling is took place during Thanksgiving weekend to highlight threats to the Winnemem and the struggles to protect California resources and cultural heritage.  The mural is on Clarion Alley, San Francisco, 1 block South of 17th near Valencia.

The Winnemem Wintu tribe brought its Warriors to San Francisco and the dying delta, to attend the mural unveiling.  “We sing to water,” says Caleen Sisk-Franco, Spiritual and Tribal Leader for the Winnemem.  “We have to give the river a voice.  We have to give the fish a voice.  The sacred places need to be protected,” said Sisk-Franco. War Dancers will be in full regalia dancing and praying for their survival in the face of Delta ecosystem crashes and the potential dam raise. Read below for more information on the dam raise and its' devastating impacts on the Winnemem Wintu.

 

Oppose the Shasta Dam Raise!

 

The US Bureau of Reclamation (Bureau) is soliciting public input through the National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA) on the proposal to raise Shasta Dam on the Sacramento and McCloud Rivers.

 

The proposal is the latest in a long line of attacks on the Winnemem Wintu Tribe. The Bureau is proposing to raise the dam by adding nearly 19 feet of concrete on top of the current structure, thus enlarging the reservoir behind the dam. The dam raise would flood several of the Winnemem Wintu Tribe’s sacred sites and commit cultural genocide in the name of unsustainable water management.

 

By flooding sites such as Puberty Rock, where young Winnemem women come of age, the Bureau of Reclamation would add onto the burden of environmental injustices the Tribe faces today. The Winnemem have already paid a hefty price for California’s destructive use of dams. The Winnemem Wintu lost 90 percent of their ancestral land when the Shasta Dam was originally built. Promises made to to create a tribal cementary held in trust and to replace the lands lost were never fulfilled. Additionally, the Tribe’s traditional food source, salmon, were decimated by the construction of the dam.

 

The Bureau of Reclamation has capitalized on the fact that the Winnemem Wintu are not a federally recognized Tribe. The Tribe is not treated as its own sovereign nation, and has thus been left out of the Bureau investigation process. Even after 4 years of meeting with Bureau officials, the first documents put out in the NEPA process make no mention of the tribe and the potential losses they face.

 

The public scoping process is the first phase of public participation under the NEPA guidelines. Tell the Bureau to extend the comment period and to  fully address the immense cultural and biological genocide that this project means. 

 

Send comments by December 7th to:

 

Mr. Louis Moore
wmoore@mp.usbr.gov
Bureau of Reclamation
2800 Cottage Way
Sacramento, CA 95825

 

For sample letters and more information, visit http://www.ejcw.org/our_work/Winnememwintu.htm

 

 

What does the Bureau of Reclamation say?

 

The Bureau says raising Shasta Dam would increase a reliable supply of water and retain more cold water for salmon.

 

What do the facts say?

 

The dam raise will produce a fairly small amount of expensive water that will go to wasteful agricultural practices in the Central Valley. The enlarged reservoir would only reliably provide less than 146,000 acre feet of water annually. In comparison, if farmers producing low-value alfalfa in California were to conserve a mere five percent of the water they consume, nearly one million acre feet of water would be saved.

 

The only way to help fish on the rivers is use the existing cold water behind the dam for salmon runs, not for subisidized water contracts.

 

The Bureau cannot create more water, only nature can regulate how much flows from Sierra snowmelt into the reservoir behind Shasta Dam. When the existing reservoir only completely filled three out of 20 years, why do we need more storage space? 

 

What is the bottom line?

 

The Winnemem Wintu are paying with their culture for the benefit of wealthy agricultural corporations and California’s unsustainable water management practices. Profits, rather than efficient water use, are the main motivation for the dam expansion.

 

Hidden costs of water development

 

While the Winnemem Wintu Tribe fights for their survival, the Bureau of Reclamation has been busy signing federal contracts with large agricultural corporations to deliver amounts of water that the state CANNOT deliver – unless there are more storage projects like the Shasta Dam enlargement.

 

Do not be fooled - the Bureau of Reclamation is not fulfilling the needs of residents in California, they are creating a need for water deliveries to a few large, wealthy agribusinesses.

 

A recent report by the Environmental Working Group found that Californian taxpayers spend about $416 million dollars subsidizing water for agriculture through the Central Valley Project, which the Shasta Dam is part of. And who recieves this gift? The mere top 10 percent of agricultural corporations control 67 percent of all the water flowing through the Central Valley Project.

 

Water from the dam raise would cost more than $220 per acre foot (one acre foot is 325,850 gallons of water), which is well beyond the rate affordable to most farmers. But with federal contracts in place, the recipients will be able to sell the water rates to the biggest buyers in water these days – deverlopers in the Central Valley and suburban Los Angeles. Why should taxpayers foot the bill for water contractors to make millions on selling water rights?

 

These are the hidden costs of raising the Shasta Dam – the loss of entire people, the Winnemem Wintu, and locking California into another 25 years of unsustainable water management.

 

More information on the Shasta Dam raise

 

At 602 feet high and storing 4.5 million acre feet of water, the Shasta Dam and Reservoir is already the eighth highest dam in the U.S. and the largest reservoir in California. But the Bureau wants to raise the dam by up to 18.5 feet and increase it reservoir size by up to 22%!

 

When the dam was built in 1945, the Central Valley Indian Lands Acquisition act was signed. The Bureau of Reclamation negotiated with the Winnemem Wintu, but never listed them as a federally recognized tribe. This has prevented the Tribe from being fully incorporated into the dam raise investigation.

 

Does taking water out of rivers to help fish really make sense? In fact, the Bureau of Reclamation is asking taxpayers to pay for their mistakes. The reason there is not enough cold water for salmon downstream is because the Bureau keeps selling the cold water to federal agribusiness contractors.

                                   

The nearly 19 foot raise would cost more than $483 million, but this estimate does not include interest, environmental mitigation costs, annual operating costs, or cost overruns common to virtually all Bureau projects.

 

The reservoir enlargement will drown several miles of the upper Sacramento, McCloud, and Pit Rivers, require the relocation or modification or more than 600 structures. It would drown miles of trout habitat.

 

The dam raise actually violates state law by flooding sections of the McCloud River that are protected under California’s Wild & Scenic Rivers Act.

 

For more information on the event, contact:

Gary Hayward Slaughter Mulcahy, tribal liaison (916) 214-8493

Evan Bissell, muralist (415) 686-2079

Mark Franco, Headman of Kerekmet Village (530) 275-2737

 

For more information on the Winnemem Wintu's struggle, visit:

www.winnememwintu.us OR http://www.ejcw.org/our_work/Winnememwintu.htm

 

Environmental Justice Coalition for Water

654 13th Street

Oakland CA 94612

(510) 286-8400

www.ejcw.org

 

Latest IITC E-News

Treaty Council May 2010 E-News

Treaty Council February 2010 E-News

Past Issues

Action Alerts /

Acciones Urgentes:

THE UNITED STATES REVIEWING ITS POSITION ON THE UN DECLARATION ON THE RIGHTS OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES:  BACKGROUND UPDATES AND POINTS FOR INPUT FROM IITC, June 15th 2010 (PDF 107K)

Chickaloon Village in Alaska takes a stand against Usibelli Coal mine, press release June 6th 2010 (PDF 42K)

US State Department Review of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Consultation schedule

IITC UPR Submission for the United States of America Examination, April 12th , 2009 (PDF 35K)

UPR State Department “Listening session” with Indigenous Peoples Agenda, Albuquerque March 16th, 2010 (PDF 407K)

HUMAN RIGHTS “LISTENING SESSIONS” AROUND US FOR THE UPR REVIEW PROCESS: National Update from IITC, February 17th 2010 (PDF 95K)

New IITC Fact Sheet: US to be reviewed by the UN Universal Periodic Review (UPR) process in 2010, submissions due April 19th , 2010 (PDF 94K)

IITC Submission to US Senate Subcommittee on Human Rights and the Law, US Obligations under International Treaties” (submissions due by December 18th) (PDF 64K)

"Millions lack access to affordable and adequate housing in the U.S.", UN Press Release November 8th 2009

Preliminary findings by the UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Adequate Housing Raquel Rolnik on her recent US visit” November 7th 2009 (PDF 103K)

Comunicación y Accion Urgente de CITI al ONU sobre el asesinato de Miguel Angel Perez en Morelos Mexico, 10 noviembre de 2010 (PDF 37K)

IITC Urgent Action Communication to the UN on the assassination of Miguel Angel Perez in Morelos Mexico, November 19th 2009 (PDF 30K)

Asesinado Dirigente Indigena en México, 31 de octubre 2009 (PDF 71K)

Indigenous leader Assassinated in Morelos Mexico October 31st 2009 (PDF 88K)

UN Rapporteur on the Human Right to Adequate Housing to visit Pine Ridge Reservation as part of US investigation, IITC press release October 11th 2009 (PDF 173K)

American Indian activist Peltier denied parole

IITC Urgent Action letter to Peruvian government, June 9th 2009 (PDF 90K)

Final “Anchorage Declaration” from the Indigenous Peoples’ Global Summit on Climate Change, April 24th 2009

 

Important Updates

Noticias al Dia:

UN Environment Programme (UNEP), First session of the intergovernmental negotiating committee to prepare a global legally binding instrument on mercury (INC 1) June 7 – 11, 2010, Stockholm Sweden- Indigenous Peoples Statement, June 7, 2010, presented by Jackie Warledo, IITC

New! Web site for the UN Rapporteur on the Situation of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of Indigenous Peoples, James Anaya

Declaración final de la Conferencia de las Organizaciones Sociales, Movimientos Sociales y ONG previo a la Consulta Regional de la FAO sobre Directrices Voluntarias de Tenencia de la Tierra y Recursos Naturales, realizada los días 17,18 y 19 de mayo de 2010, Brasilia, Brasil

UNPFII 9th session, Joint Interventions and reports submitted or endorsed by IITC

Minister of Maori affairs Dr. Pita Sharples announced to the UNPFII 9th session April 19th, 2010: “Today New Zealand changes its position: We are pleased to express our support for the Declaration"

US Permanent Representative to the UN announces at UNPFII9, April 20th 2010: “The United States has decided to review our position regarding the U.N. Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples”

A Brief Overview: Key United States' International Human Rights Obligations relevant to the UN Universal Periodic Review (UPR) Process" IITC handout (PDF 83K)

International Expert Group Meeting: Indigenous Children and Youth in Detention, Custody, Foster-Care and Adoption

Lima Declaration, II Latin American Indigenous Summit on Climate Change January 25 – 26, 2010 (PDF 163K)

UN Expert Mechanism on Indigenous Peoples calls for submissions for Study on Right to Participate in Decision Making” by February 26th (PDF 17K)

Declaración de Lima Por la Vida de la Madre Naturaleza y Humana”, II Cumbre Latinoamericana sobre Cambio Climático e Impacto en los Pueblos Indígenas: Post Copenhague, Lima, Perú el 25 y 26 de Enero del 2010 (PDF 162K)

NEW BOOK - Making the Declaration Work

International Indigenous Peoples Forum on Climate Change Final High Level Statement to COP4 in Copenhagen, December 18, 2009

Certificate of Honor presented to the IITC by the City and County of San Francisco Board of Supervisors, November 23rd 2009 (PDF 284K)

International Indigenous Peoples’ Forum on Climate Change (IIPFCC) Statement on Shared Vision, COP 15, Copenhagen, 7 December 2009

United Nations Permanent Forum 9th session, April 19th - 30th 2010

Alcatraz Thanksgiving and 40th Anniversary Sunrise Gathering November 26th 2009 (PDF 696K)

IITC Brochure 10-09 (PDF 132K)

IITC Brochure, En Espanol 10-09 (PDF 132K)

IITC 2009 Annual Conference Resolutions/Resoluciones de la Conferencia Anual de CITI de 2009 en Ustupu Panama

New IITC Handout: “Food Sovereignty and the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (PDF 254K)

Oja informativa actualizada de CITI: “La Soberanía Alimentaria y los Derechos de los Pueblos Indígenas” (PDF 266K)

New/Nuevo: Necessary Information for Complaints to Human Rights Bodies/ Información Necesaria para las Comunicaciones a instancias de Derechos Humanos (PDF 71K)

New brochure: IITC Human Rights Training Program (PDF 371K)

Nuevo folleto: Programa de Capacitación y Formación sobre Derechos Humanos de CITI (PDF 168K)

OHCHR Study on climate change and human rights

Indigenous Peoples and the Right to Free Prior Informed Consent”, new IITC educational factsheet (PDF 115K)

Los Pueblos Indigenas y el Derecho al Consentamiento Libre, Previa e Informada”, nueva hoja informative de CITI (PDF 111K)

IITC Submission to the OHCHR for Study on Human Rights and Climate Change- December 26th, 2008 (PDF 272K)

NEW Indigenous Portal for up to the minute news on Indigenous Peoples’ work at the UN and around the world

Human Rights Training Materials

New: Updated IITC fact sheet: Pesticides, Tribal Health and Human Rights, North and South (PDF 111K)

Nuevo: Hoja informativa actualizada de CITI: “LOS PLAGUICIDAS, LA SALUD DE LAS TRIBUS Y LOS DERECHOS HUMANOS EN EL NORTE Y EL SUR” (PDF 111K)

UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples as adopted by the UN General Assembly September 13th 2007 (PDF 56k)

Declaracion de las Naciones Unidas sobre los derechos de los Pueblos Indigenas, adoptada por la Asemblea General el 13 de septiembre de 2007 (PDF 60K) 

Link for the COMMITTEE FOR THE ELIMINATION OF RACIAL DISCRIMINATION

Pesticides are Poison” booklet now available online

Los Plaguicidas son Venenos” manual ahora disponible en internet

UN Web page, Indigenous Peoples and Treaties, the UN Treaty Study Expert Seminars